Those who have read the
script have realized that the film is rather poetic, even oneiric in some scenes.
For many reasons, the film to be used is very important tome. That's why I have been watching many reels from different directors of photography trying to find what I needed. Today, I want to talk to you about the team who's going to have the image of The Cosmonaut in their hands, and also about the equipment that they are going to use to make it possible.
THE TEAM The first important decision I took was to have a director of photography for the movie different than the one for the
transmedia. I thought important to count on two different points of view due to the huge amount of material we want to shoot and the different approach we will do to the images.
I introduce you to
Luis Enrique Carrión and
Pablo Clemente. LE will be The Cosmonaut DOP. Pablo will be the transmedia DOP. I could tell a lot of things about the both of them, but I think a picture is worth a thousand words. Here you have their reels:
Luis Enrique Carrión Pablo Clemente I'm marveled any time I see any new piece of work they create. They both know what they do, they know their tools, and they both are really receptive to my words.
Another important decision we took was to have the smallest camera team possible, reduced to the minimum, although it meant working harder. We believed that a reduced camera team will help the actors to move freely, everything to go faster, and we to be lighter, to adapt.
That's why they are going to be the ones to operate the camera. We will just have 4 more people.
The rest of the film team is:
Paco Serrano: camera operator and steadicam with hawk eye that has been working together with Riot Cinema almost since we started. He will be the assistant cameraperson and focus puller. He will also do his magic with the steadicam.
Adán Martín, Luis Enrique's usual assistant. His definition of him: He is a Swiss Army knife, Accurate and Ready for anything. He will be the gaffer and second assistant.
Manuel Portillo, filmmaker and expert in colorimetry, calibration and Canon cameras. He will be our media manager, calibrating and classifying the files in real time while we shoot. He will also be our HD technician, and he will be in charge of making sure every pixel is where it's supposed to be. As a curiosity, he made all the images in Pablo's reel.
The transmedia team will also have another assistant cameraperson we haven't chose yet, and
Bruno, who you already know. He will be in charge of coordination the creative part.
I'm not only happy because they are all really talented people, but because I feel I'm in good hands.
THE CAMERAS The third important decision (and probably the most difficult one) was which cameras we were going to use to shoot. We knew from the beginning that it was going to be a digital camera (we love the film, but it's not our mean. It's a kind of technology from the past we worship, but we wouldn't be comfortable working with it, mainly if we think about our budget and the way we want to work).
Taking that into account, we think the
RED ONE will be the best choice for a matter of quality. We discussed a lot. We thought it over. We watched dozens of videos and proofs, and we finally decided to make a hope for the new stuff, as almost anything within this project.
We are going to shoot the movie with
DSLR cameras . DSLR cameras are photography cameras that also shoot videos.
For the past couple of years, DSLRs have arrived in the world of independent cinema. They have brought new different aesthetics where no new inventions were expected. They are still barely used in fiction, but videoclips and spots have taken advantage of it. There are some series, such as
House,
Luck by Michael Mann and other HBO series that have started to used them in their episodes. There are some professionals that compare them to the cutting-edge digital cameras, and they are surprised to find out that few-thousand-euro cameras are able to compete in color and texture.
I'm surprised how a new technology can inspire an
aesthetics. It's the aesthetics of our period: intense colors, contrast, almost pure black, lights and partial focusing.
Suddenly, the focusing has arrived to homemade videos, and digital productions have depth of field, shades and interchangeable lenses again. We get surprisingly poetic, bright and lively results thanks to the mix of having the camera in hand, the digital aesthetics and a minimum depth of field.
It's great that it's been raised for discussion if it's a momentary trend; if it should stay or not; if it's beautiful or not. What we know for sure is that it's fascinating, and that we all want to play with this new-discovered aesthetics. We want to see how it puts reality and fiction closer.
Here are my reasons. Now, Luis Enrique, Pablo and Manu are going to explain the pros and cons of these cameras in a technical way, and why they (therefore, me) are not worried at all with the decision.
Nicolás Alcalá